Earlier this 12 months we wrote a bit about Canadian based mostly Tucows asserting an settlement to accumulate wholesale area title registrar eNom from Rightside Group. Tucows paid $83.5 million for the acquisition of eNom, the 14.5 million domains underneath its administration, and a further 28,000 lively resellers. Tucows now had a complete community of over 40,000 resellers globally and 29 million domains underneath administration making it the second largest area registrar on the planet. All sounded good till you thought-about that 7 million of these domains had been registered via Enom on the reseller account of Namecheap. Though the timing might have been coincidental, NameCheap introduced just about concurrently that it had stopped reselling domains via Enom and domains arising for renewal could be routinely transferred from Enom to NameCheap.
In a lawsuit filed in Seattle (pdf) on the finish of August, Namecheap alleged that Tucows was thwarting its effort to switch domains registered via Namecheap when it was an Enom reseller.
In keeping with the courtroom submitting, the problem appears to revolve round whether or not this switch qualifies for a “Bulk Switch After Partial Portfolio Acquisition”, or BTAPPA. The sort of switch was setup to switch a bunch of domains between registrars in bulk when one registrar acquires one other.
Namecheap says that Verisign has already accredited the switch of those domains via BTAPPA and that an switch settlement was in place previous to the sale of eNom. However Tucows, based on the go well with, says it doesn’t qualify:
Tucows has refused to finish the majority switch of the VeriSign Domains to Namecheap utilizing the BTAPPA service based mostly on the unmeritorious argument that doing so would violate ICANN/VeriSign guidelines, laws and processes….
Namecheap additionally claims that Tucows is worried that the mass switch of domains “would wreak such havoc and confusion” due to the amount and since .com is a skinny Whois through which registrant knowledge stays with the registrar, not the registry.
Namecheap reasoned that Enom/Tucows may need to gradual the switch stating that even when eNom’s margin on Namecheap’s area registrations had been fairly low and the settlement allowed Enom to retain 100% of expired area income and all parking income throughout registrations and in the course of the expiration cycle.
Namecheap additionally stated it provided to make a money cost to Tucows and execute a separate buy settlement in order that the deal could be thought-about a partial acquisition “and thereby obviate any additional foundation for disagreement about whether or not the VeriSign Domains switch qualifies for the BTAPPA service.” Tucows rejected this selection based on the go well with.
In October Namecheap voluntarily dismissed this case with out prejudice, which means that it may refile the claims at a later time. Area title registrar Namecheap is massive, however till this 12 months it didn’t present up on charts rating registrars by domains as a result of Namecheap acted as an Enom reseller. As soon as Namecheap started registering new .com domains by itself registrar accreditation, it has been usually ranked because the fifth largest registrar every month on the subject of new .com registrations.
ICANN revealed the most recent official .com transactions report from Verisign on December 1st 2017 however this solely consists of knowledge by registrar till August 2017. The highest registrars by way of new .com registrations for August confirmed no modifications in rating from July.
GoDaddy* 922,658 Tucows** 193,081 PublicDomainRegistry 135,332 HiChina 128,586 Namecheap 121,858
That’s more likely to change as on the most recent record of Registrars with the Highest Internet Progress, Namecheap ranks quantity two, surpassed solely by GoDaddy. (editor’s notice.. GoDaddy is ranked far and away primary, a league of its personal. However that may be a entire completely different story).